Jung’s Archetypes: Meaning, Examples and the Myth of the 12 Types

What is an archetype?

The word comes from the Greek arche, origin or first principle, and typos, imprint or pattern. It is much older than Jung: he pointed out that it appears in Philo of Alexandria, in Irenaeus, in the Corpus Hermeticum and in Dionysius the Areopagite, always in the sense of an original model.

In his early writings Jung spoke of “primordial images”, a phrase he took from the historian Jacob Burckhardt. He began using “archetype” in 1919, in the essay “Instinct and the Unconscious”. There he linked the two ideas closely: instincts are typical ways of acting, and archetypes are typical ways of perceiving and imagining. He even described the archetype as the way an instinct pictures itself.

Archetypes are the contents of the collective unconscious. They are not learned, but they are also not fixed pictures stored in the brain. They are tendencies that become visible only when they take shape in an image, a story, a fantasy or a strong emotion.

Archetype and archetypal image

Jung drew a careful distinction between the archetype in itself and the archetypal image. To explain it he used the image of a crystal. The axial system of a crystal determines its structure before any crystal has formed, yet it has no material existence of its own; the actual crystal can be large or small and take many shapes. In the same way the archetype is a form without content, and the images it produces are always concrete and local.

That is why the mother archetype can appear as a goddess, as the Virgin Mary, as the earth, a cave, the sea, a city or a grandmother, and why one culture’s wise old man is a hermit and another’s is a wizard. In his late essay “On the Nature of the Psyche” (1947) Jung called the archetype in itself psychoid: never fully knowable, and reaching beyond the psyche toward the body.

The main archetypes Jung described

Jung said there are as many archetypes as there are typical situations in life, and he never drew up a closed list. Some figures, however, recur throughout his work and have become the classic Jungian archetypes.

The Shadow

The rejected and unknown side of the personality, often met first in other people. See the shadow.

The Persona

The social mask, the role we play for the world. See the persona.

Anima and Animus

The inner feminine image in a man and the inner masculine image in a woman, guides toward the deeper unconscious. See anima and animus.

The Self

The archetype of wholeness and the center of the whole psyche, often symbolized by the mandala. See the Self and individuation.

The Great Mother

Nourishing and protecting, but also devouring and possessive. Jung described both sides in “Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype” (1938/1954). See also the old woman.

The Wise Old Man

The figure of spirit and meaning who appears when the hero is lost and gives advice, a magic object or a task. See the old man.

The Trickster

The shape-shifting, boundary-crossing figure of disorder and humor, from Hermes to the Native American trickster tales Jung discussed with the anthropologist Paul Radin.

The Divine Child

An image of new beginnings and future possibilities, vulnerable and invincible at the same time, described in an essay written with the mythologist Karl Kerényi.

The Hero

The figure who leaves home, faces the monster or descends into the depths and returns transformed, a central theme of Symbols of Transformation.

Rebirth

Not a figure but a process: death and renewal, initiation and transformation, the subject of Jung’s essay “Concerning Rebirth” (1940).

Where do the 12 archetypes come from?

Search for Jungian archetypes and you will often find a list of twelve: the Innocent, the Everyman, the Hero, the Caregiver, the Explorer, the Rebel, the Lover, the Creator, the Jester, the Sage, the Magician and the Ruler. Jung did not write this list.

It comes from later authors. The educator Carol S. Pearson described six and then twelve archetypes of personal development in The Hero Within (1986) and Awakening the Heroes Within (1991). The best known version, used in branding and marketing, was published by Margaret Mark and Carol S. Pearson in The Hero and the Outlaw (2001). These models are inspired by Jung and can be useful tools, but they turn archetypes into personality or brand types, which is something Jung explicitly avoided.

A similar caution applies to the “four main archetypes” often listed online: persona, shadow, anima or animus, and Self. This is a fair summary of the structure of the personality in Jung’s theory, but not a complete list of the archetypes.

How archetypes appear in life

Archetypes reveal themselves in images and in emotion. In dreams they appear as figures and scenes that feel larger than life. In myths, fairy tales and religions they take shape as gods, monsters, journeys and rituals. In daily life they are often projected onto people: the partner who seems to embody every hope, the leader who seems like a savior, the group that becomes a scapegoat.

Jung used the word numinous, borrowed from the theologian Rudolf Otto, for the peculiar emotional charge of an archetypal experience: fascinating, awe-inspiring, sometimes frightening. When a life situation activates an archetype, Jungians say it is constellated.

In literature and film the idea became a whole school of criticism, from Maud Bodkin’s Archetypal Patterns in Poetry (1934) to Northrop Frye’s Anatomy of Criticism (1957). Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1949), which George Lucas acknowledged as an influence on Star Wars, popularized the archetypal hero’s journey.

Are archetypes innate? The modern debate

Jung held that archetypes are inherited with the structure of the brain. Critics answer that recurring motifs can be explained by cultural transmission and shared experience. Between these positions, several modern proposals have appeared: Anthony Stevens linked archetypes to evolved behavioral systems studied by ethologists; Jean Knox described them as reliably emerging patterns of early development; James Hillman’s archetypal psychology set aside the question of origin and focused on the image itself.

What remains undisputed is the observation that started it all: certain images and stories keep coming back across times and places. Archetype Matrix offers a small window on this today, by showing which symbols people log most around the world.

Frequently asked questions